Papua – The Armed Criminal Group (KKB) in Papua has once again come under scrutiny as experts and political observers call for the group to cease its violence and terror that has long plagued the region. The appeal comes from Syahganda Nainggolan, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Sabang-Merauke Circle (SMC) Public Policy Institute, who suggested that the KKB take a cue from the Free Aceh Movement (GAM), emphasizing dialogue over armed struggle to resolve Papua’s prolonged conflict.
Syahganda highlighted that resolving conflict through dialogue has proven effective, as seen in Aceh, where GAM laid down its arms and transitioned to negotiations. “By ending the armed struggle and creating space for dialogue, the prospects for peaceful resolution in Papua will become more viable. This will not only put an end to the violence but also bring about fundamental changes and new hope for a better future for the Papuan people,” Syahganda stated.
The process of initiating dialogue is seen as critical, particularly in accommodating the diverse interests in Papua. The conflict in the region not only involves the KKB but also various societal elements with differing aspirations. Syahganda pointed out that Papuan leaders should be more proactive in fostering dialogue, providing a platform to discuss the key issues at hand, including the KKB’s grievances and aspirations.
He also emphasized the importance of the central government’s role in facilitating this dialogue. “The government must take an active role in creating a platform for dialogue, as it is crucial not just for the KKB but for the entire Papuan community, who have been living in fear for far too long due to the ongoing violence,” he added.
The ongoing violence by the KKB has severe consequences for Papuan society, affecting security, economy, and social welfare. Terrorist activities by the KKB have instilled deep fear, especially in rural areas. Many residents are forced to abandon their homes and farmlands in fear of attacks, leading to a loss of livelihoods and a decline in agricultural production in regions heavily reliant on farming.
Public services such as healthcare and education have also been severely impacted. Many public facilities are unable to operate effectively due to threats from the armed group. Teachers and healthcare workers are often unwilling to serve in high-risk areas, depriving communities of essential services like education and medical care.
Economically, the persistent acts of terror by the KKB directly hinder infrastructure development in Papua. Government projects aimed at improving public welfare are either delayed or stopped due to security threats. The presence of the KKB has also discouraged both domestic and foreign investments, stifling economic growth in a region that already faces numerous development challenges.
By embracing dialogue, Papua could break free from the cycle of violence that has lasted for years. An inclusive and open dialogue would allow various parties to discuss key issues such as economic inequality, political representation, and the rights of indigenous communities—long-standing sources of tension in the region.
“If we can open the door for fair and equal dialogue, we will witness significant changes in Papua’s social and political structures. This will provide the Papuan people with new hope for a more stable and prosperous future,” Syahganda said.
The success of dialogue would not only end the conflict but also pave the way for reconciliation and more inclusive development in Papua. With the cessation of violence, the region can finally focus on improving the well-being of its people, contributing positively to national growth and stability.